Today
VOTERS IN THE LARGEST STATE WILL DECIDE WHETHER TO TAX THE BILLIONAIRES WHO FUND THE MACHINE, A SENATE CANDIDATE’S WIFE WAS CAUGHT HANDING OUT GIFT CARDS AT A GAS STATION, A FOREIGN SATELLITE APPROACHED AN AMERICAN SATELLITE IN ORBIT AND THEN RETREATED — AND THE ALLY RAIDED CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS ONE WEEK BEFORE ITS OWN ELECTION

Elon Musk’s One Stock Retirement Plan

Sometimes you come across an opportunity so explosive…

That it has the potential to turn a small stake…

Into a six figure and in some rare cases even a seven-figure nest egg…

Like it happened when I picked Nvidia in 2016.

It jumped high enough to turn $5,000 into an entire retirement nest egg of $1,895,000.

And while I can’t guarantee you’ll become a millionaire...

I think this little-known AI stock is one of those opportunities…

Which is why I call it “Elon Musk’s One Stock Retirement Plan.”

Now, if this idea of retiring with a single stock sounds crazy to you…

You should know that some of the best investors in the world believe that the idea of diversification is a little overrated.

Stanley Druckenmiller said…

“You don’t get rich by diversifying into 50 mediocre assets. You get rich by finding two or three asymmetric home runs.”

I believe this stock is an asymmetric home run.

Or listen to legendary investor Peter Lynch. He said…

“I would own one stock if I can find one great stock.”

Even Warren Buffett said…

“Diversification is protection against ignorance. It makes little sense if you know what you are doing.”

Click here now and I’ll show you why I believe this stock might be the only one you need to retire.

A ballot measure in California will let voters decide whether to impose a wealth tax on billionaires whose net worth exceeds $1 billion. Proposition 40 would generate an estimated $22 billion per year. Democracy Now devoted a full segment to the measure on Tuesday.

One person gave $366 million to midterm campaigns. Another paid $100,000 for access to the president’s inner circle. A third received a $150 million payday when a media merger closed. And $330 million flowed through the White House ballroom from donors who benefited from the policies signed inside the same building.

The question the measure asks is simple: should the people who fund the machine also pay the tax the machine has been cutting for them? The billionaires spent more than $200 million fighting the proposition. The voters will decide on November 3.

Millions marched in “No Kings” demonstrations last weekend. Now the largest state in the country has put the question on the ballot. The streets said no more. The ballot asks: how much?

The machine runs on money. The ballot asks the public whether the people who supply it should pay. Fourteen days before the election.

22 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR. FROM BILLIONAIRES. THE PUBLIC WILL VOTE ON IT. THE BILLIONAIRES SPENT 200 MILLION TO STOP IT.

BREAKING

A Senate Candidate’s Wife Was Caught Handing Out Gift Cards at a Gas Station While Wearing a Campaign Sticker

Kristi Rogers, the wife of Michigan Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers, was spotted handing out $10 gift cards to potential voters at a Detroit gas station while wearing a campaign sticker. Democracy Now reported the incident in its Tuesday headlines. Critics called it vote-buying.

Federal law prohibits offering anything of value to voters in exchange for their vote. A $10 gift card at a gas station with a campaign sticker on your chest is not subtle. It is a transaction in the open.

The same government that ordered 3,000 enforcement actions a day to root out voter fraud, indicted 10 people for 10 ballots out of 8.5 million, and sent agents to polling sites… watches a Senate candidate’s wife hand out gift cards at a gas station with a sticker on.

The machine sends 3,000 agents a day to protect the election. The candidate’s wife hands out gift cards at the pump. One is called enforcement. The other is called campaigning.

EXPOSED

A Russian Satellite Approached an American Satellite in Orbit — and Then Retreated

A Russian satellite approached an American satellite in orbit before retreating. Democracy Now reported the encounter in its Tuesday headlines. The incident took place while the administration continues to place its own weapons systems in orbit and the spy chief now oversees AI policy for both defense and surveillance.

Space is no longer neutral territory. The administration put weapons in orbit earlier this year. The president bought millions in SpaceX bonds before signing a space policy order. And now a foreign satellite approached an American one close enough for the military to track it.

The conflict on the ground has carrier groups in the strait. The conflict in orbit now has satellites approaching each other. The fronts are multiplying: land, sea, air, cyber, and now space.

The machine put weapons in orbit. A rival sent a satellite to look at them. The orbit is no longer empty. It is contested.

“Should the people who fund the machine also pay the tax the machine has been cutting for them? The voters will decide.”

— The question at the center of California’s Proposition 40

DEVELOPING

The Ally Raided Civil Society Groups in the West Bank One Week Before Its Own Election

Israeli military forces raided the offices of Palestinian nongovernmental organizations in the occupied West Bank. Democracy Now called it a “propaganda show” ahead of Israel’s October 27 election and devoted a full segment to it Tuesday.

The groups raided provide legal aid, document human rights conditions, and advocate for civilian protection. The raids came one week before the Israeli election and days after the president endorsed the prime minister on social media.

The pattern is the same on both sides of the ocean. The government raided a sitting congresswoman’s home. The ally raided civil society groups. Both happened before elections. Both targeted the people who hold the machine accountable.

The machine raids the oversight before the vote. The timing is not a coincidence. It is a method.

 Connecting the Dots 

▸ The Bigger Picture

Four stories from one Tuesday. California voters will decide whether to tax the billionaires who fund the machine… while the billionaires spent $200 million to stop the question from being asked. A Senate candidate’s wife was caught handing out gift cards at a gas station while the government sends 3,000 agents a day to protect the election. A Russian satellite approached an American satellite in orbit while the administration puts weapons in space and the spy chief runs AI. And the ally raided civil society groups one week before its own election while the president endorsed its prime minister.

The press covers each on its own page. A “ballot measure.” A “campaign incident.” A “space encounter.” A “military operation.” But the thread is the same in every one.

The machine is being voted on, caught, approached, and raided… all in the same week. The ballot asks whether the billionaires pay. The gift card asks whether the rules apply to both sides. The satellite asks whether the orbit is still ours. And the raids ask whether civil society survives the election. Fourteen days from now, the voters will answer the question the streets asked last weekend. The billionaires know what the question costs them. They spent $200 million to make it go away. The voters will decide whether it does.

When the ballot asks the billionaires to pay and the candidate’s wife hands out gift cards and the satellite approaches and the ally raids the oversight before the vote… the machine is not just running. It is running toward the election. That’s the Seventh Floor.

They rely on the shadows.
It’s time to turn on the lights.