Today
THE SUPREME COURT REJECTED THE GOVERNMENT’S ATTEMPT TO SET ASIDE 20,000 BALLOTS, ONE PERSON SPENT 474 MILLION DOLLARS ON THIS ELECTION AND THE VOTERS REJECTED THE CANDIDATES HE BACKED, A FORMER HEAD OF A MAJOR FEDERAL OFFICE IS SUING THE GOVERNMENT OVER POLITICALLY MOTIVATED PROSECUTIONS — AND TWO DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS WON SEATS IN THE LEGISLATURE

Write down this “Fed rate” ticker today…

The ticker is TLT… and Larry Benedict says it just became more important than ever.

The Federal Reserve’s recent hike could send it moving fast, and Larry plans to trade it in an unusual way that could double your money…

See how he plans to trade TLT now.

The Supreme Court of the United States rejected the government’s attempt to force California to set aside 20,000 mail-in ballots. Democracy Now reported the ruling in its election day headlines. The highest court in the country told the government: no.

This is the seventh federal court ruling against the administration’s campaign to control the election in two months. The press ban. The pollster lawsuit. The taxpayer ads. The sanctions on groups supporting the international court. The California ballot challenge. The ten-billion-dollar lawsuit against a newspaper. And now the Supreme Court.

The government built the voter database. It sent the list that caught American-born citizens. It gave the state 48 hours. A judge said the challenge would wreak havoc. The government opened a criminal probe the next day. And the Supreme Court said: the 20,000 ballots stand.

Seven rulings. Seven losses. Every level of the judiciary… from district courts to the highest court in the land… told the machine the same thing.

The machine tried to remove 20,000 ballots from the count. The Supreme Court put them back. The voters counted.

SEVEN COURT RULINGS. SEVEN LOSSES. FROM DISTRICT COURTS TO THE SUPREME COURT. THE MACHINE LOST EVERY TIME.

BREAKING

One Person Spent 474 Million Dollars on This Election — and the Voters Rejected the Candidates He Backed

Elon Musk spent a record-shattering $474 million on the 2026 midterm elections. Democracy Now reported the final figure in its election day headlines. It is the largest amount ever spent by a single individual on a single election cycle in American history.

And the voters said no. In Texas, the candidate he backed… the same one who was caught on tape telling donors the conflict was costing him the election… lost to a Democrat for the first time in the state since 1994. Early returns showed the House flipping. The Senate remained too close to call.

Four hundred and seventy-four million dollars from one person. Billions in government contracts flowing back. Classified satellite data handed to his company. The president bought his bonds before signing the order that benefits it. And the voters in the states where he spent the most money rejected the candidates he chose.

The machine spent the most money in history. The voters did not do what the money told them to. That is what the machine cannot buy: the vote itself.

EXPOSED

A Former Head of a Major Federal Office Is Suing the Government — Alleging the Prosecutions Are Politically Driven

The former head of the Chicago field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation filed a lawsuit against the Department of Justice, alleging the department is conducting politically motivated prosecutions. Democracy Now reported the lawsuit in its election day headlines.

The machine is now being challenged by its own former leaders. The government tried to prosecute a former director of the same agency over a decade-old claim. And now the former head of one of its most powerful field offices says the system he once ran is being used as a political weapon.

Senators blocked from bases. Judges complained against. Prosecutors punished. Networks banned. A lawmaker raided. The president said a lawmaker could go to prison. A former director targeted. And now a former field office chief says the prosecutions are political… and he is willing to say it in court.

The machine punishes everyone who checks it. The people it punished are now checking it back. From the inside. Under oath.

“We just took back Texas.”

— James Talarico, the first Democrat to win a Texas Senate seat since 1994, on election night

DEVELOPING

Two Democratic Socialists Won Seats in the Legislature — the Machine Spent Billions and They Won Anyway

Darializa Avila Chevalier and Claire Valdez are projected to win seats in the House of Representatives, becoming two of the youngest members of the legislature. Democracy Now devoted a full segment to their campaigns on election day.

They ran on the issues the machine spent a year trying to bury: the cost of the conflict, the housing crisis, the student debt load, and the concentration of wealth in the hands of the people who fund the campaigns. They were outspent. They won anyway.

One person spent $474 million. Corporations spent $737 million. The super-rich gave $4.2 billion. And two candidates who called the system by its name… walked into the building the money was designed to control.

The machine spent the most money in the history of American elections. Two democratic socialists won anyway. The money buys the ads. It does not buy the people.

 Connecting the Dots 

▸ The Bigger Picture

Four stories the morning after. The Supreme Court rejected the government’s attempt to throw out 20,000 ballots… the seventh court ruling against the machine in two months. One person spent $474 million… the most in American history… and the voters in the states where he spent the most rejected the candidates he chose. A former head of a major federal office filed a lawsuit saying the prosecutions are politically driven. And two democratic socialists won seats in the legislature despite being outspent by the billions that flowed through the system.

The press is running the scoreboard. Which party won. Which seats flipped. Which donors are happy. But the real story is the one underneath the scoreboard.

The machine lost seven times in court. It spent the most money in history and lost the races it spent the most on. Its own former leaders are suing it under oath. And the candidates who named the machine out loud walked into the building the money was built to control. This newsletter has published 92 issues and told 512 stories. It has tracked every dollar, every ruling, every name, and every cost. The election happened. The machine did not stop. But the courts said no seven times. The voters said no in Texas for the first time in 30 years. And two people who called the system what it is won seats inside it. The machine is still running. But the ground underneath it shifted last night.

The election is over. The machine is not. But the people who check it… the courts, the voters, the candidates, the former officials who file under oath… are still here too. That’s the Seventh Floor.

They rely on the shadows.
It’s time to turn on the lights.